Carolyn and her husband with her team of 5 people

A self directed approach enables me to recruit and choose my own team of staff who assist me to live in my own home.

After 20 years of independent living and using a wide range of services, staff and models of support, I believe the success of my care is based on the quality of the relationships I have with my staff and the work I do to make this work for me.

With the right team you can work with people who understand a ‘give and take’ approach, are flexible and have the will to help you solve problems.

Get the best from your team

It’s essential to be clear about your needs. Honesty is the best policy.  And be clear about what you expect from them. Ambiguity is not helpful and usually leads to miscommunication.In addition to being verbally clear, use a responsibility checklist, or more formal contract.

Model the behaviour you expect from them. If you tell them you will cover their shift then cover it.

It takes skills in negotiation and sometimes creative thinking if shifts need to be swapped or changed in emergencies. For instance, staff contact me directly if they are sick or have another problem getting to their shift. I can then assess the situation, and I generally know the commitments and schedules of each staff person. I may offer a bonus if it is very late notice. If I get stuck I have the numbers of a few agencies that are 24 hour contactable who could find staff.

I rarely rely on family to fill in. Unlike the bad old days when I was constantly getting stuck without support, busting for the toilet or missing out on meals.

Keep the right people

Once you have created a great team it takes work to maintain it. Just like anything maintenance and servicing cannot be overlooked otherwise the whole car will start to shake.

Over the years I have developed a strong team culture. I have had little turnover and I feel very positive about the people in my team and I know they feel positive in return.

One of the things I think I do well is to pay attention to people and pay attention to the relationship. I understand that it is a person’s job and that supporting me is just one aspect of their lives. So I take a really wholistic approach and this has served me well. I put a lot of emphasis on relationship, celebration, positive feedback, focussing on their strengths and keeping them well informed.

While I still need to step in on occasion and address problems with team members, I have found these strategies have lessened the difficulties.

I’m really looking forward to sharing my top 8 tips with you that you can use to create a positive team culture.

Want to hear more?

Carolyn is one of our guest speakers at our next online session on February 26th 2015.

Click here to find out more and register.

a group brainstorms with a person with disability

Lyne Mear is a consultant in Human Resources, Industrial Relations and Employees Relations. Her focus is creating work places that are self-generating, solution oriented and enjoyable.

One of the questions I am often asked by people who really want to be front and centre of their supports is

“How can I get more of the good stuff and less of the big service tasks like managing people and doing rosters and paperwork?”

Many families also ask me “How do I get support workers to see what I see, to think ahead and to really do what’s needed?”

I am very pleased to share some of my experience in methods and strategies that will help you develop a positive, flexible and engaged team culture.

Paradoxically I have found that the more people are asked to report and be accountable up a line of management, the less they see things and really take responsibility. The only way to do this is to have practice in taking the responsibility, to really know ‘the buck stops with me on this issue’.

A self managing team

One of the solutions I have worked with people on, is to set up a self managing team. This is a team of workers operating in a manner that requires little top down management. There is still the need for strong governance and oversight, and connection with people, but less of the stuff that takes you away from core business in running your life and your supports.

Self managing teams work best where there are teams of small numbers that are committed to an outcome that is ‘greater’ than the individuals’ self-interest.   Teams working in social welfare, social conscience areas are ideally suited to a self-managed team system.

This idea started many years ago when I was working as a manager of a start-up disability service whose aim was to provide support for independent living for people with disabilities. I was asked to come up with a service provision model for a woman with acquired brain injury from a horrific motor vehicle accident. I needed to find a way of providing support 24/7 that was affordable and also encompassed the principals that my organisation had committed to.  This woman’s parents had the view that she needed to live independently in her own home as an adult. One of the founding principles was that people have the right to live and develop freely.  I believe very strongly in the human right to develop and grow in our own journey.  I still believe this today.

We managed both these things by setting up a self-reliant and self-organising team.  This structure held the principals of self-determination; encouraged the team to self-determine and was the most economical.  Little outlay is involved in the administration and coordination of the arrangement and the team and the person being supported have the opportunity to learn and grow in the arrangement.

That structure has been in operation now for 20 odd years and has been an amazing learning experience for me as well as all those who have been involved in the journey. I am still involved with this woman and her family. For the woman I believe it has provided the best opportunity to live a real life that could have been provided.

I am a consultant in human resources, industrial relations and employees relations, working in some pretty big organisations, and I take these principles wherever I go. I have also taken these principles to work with other families.

The key components

The components of a self managing team are:

1. communication – things must be discussed;
2. openness – things must be discussed;
3. willingess to listen and understand other points of view – things must be discussed;
4. tolerance – other viewpoints need to be allowed to be and these must be discussed;
5. clear vision – an understanding of what is desired must be obvious and understood by all;
6. collaboration – the whole concept is based on the premise of working together;
7. flexibility – there are many ways to achieve the vision. The joy and creativity of working in such a team and to experience the differing ways is amazing;
8. diversity – adds enormously to the creativity of the arrangement;
9. and a sense of purpose – comes back to the vision.

The first steps

Setting-up the arrangement is the biggest and most important piece of work.

The most important parts of the set-up are:

1. engaging and enrolling the team in a clear vision;
2. developing really clear boundaries and expectations within which they will operate;
3. being able to let go but maintain those boundaries
4. developing the systems to monitor;
5. and working with people to move from having things set out for them, to taking responsibility. This is because mostly people are not used to being able to self-manage and being held accountable for the consequences of their actions. Most people are used to reporting to supervisors.

The benefits

A team that is self managing well can do things like take responsibility for their rostering, communication and self-organise amongst themselves and develop a common purpose. They may be delegated authority around the day-to-day aspects of the person’s life and learn to think forward and dream into the person’s life, and organise to achieve those things with the person.

The benefits are that people are more able to enjoy their life or enjoy their family role with the person rather than being the ‘manager’ all the time.

I’m looking forward to sharing more strategies with you.

Want to hear more from Lyne? Click here to join our online session on February 26th 2015.

Do you feel limited by what’s on offer and want to decide how you are supported and who does it?

Are you working in the sector and want to learn more about self direction in Australia?

In this recording you hear 3 people who all self direct their supports:

• Learn the benefits of self directed support in terms you can understand.
• Discover different approaches to working with the available organisations.
• Discover how you can self direct supports under the National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS).
• Hear firsthand accounts on how to make the most out of your support mechanisms from people who understand.

Our sessions are live captioned and AUSLAN interpreted, although the recordings are not yet transcribed.

Image of a record and the needle of a record player

What are the elements that make for good ethical partnerships between families and services?

We haven’t been partners

Families have been very used to a system in which professionals and service providers have been invested in as the ‘solution-makers’. This model has rendered invisible the social innovation capacity of people with disability to develop their own solutions as it generates a ‘solution-receiver’ role which is largely passive. The search for solutions outside oneself means that services end up (both if you can get a service and also if you can’t get a service) playing a big role in people’s lives.

In addition, historically people receiving services have, by-and-large, been offered fixed models of care and support. This means that services are largely created before people arrive on the scene. This results in a ‘one size fits all’ approach. Such a system is not able to provide what a person needs to maximise the potential of their life. Maximising a person’s potential is predicated on a personalised system, where support can be designed with people, ‘one person at a time’.

What does truly personalised support demand?

Creating personalised solutions means people with disability will move from being passive recipients of ‘one size fits all’ care to ‘partners’, ‘creators’ and ‘drivers’ of solutions. To grasp this opportunity they will need to become engaged in the design and delivery of their own support arrangements, and become equipped to choose and direct the services they receive.

The beauty of the possibility of the National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS) is that those who choose to self-manage their funds may not even need to use a traditional service to provide what is outlined in their plan. This possibility needs wide-scale promotion.

We also know, however, that larger numbers of people still continue to rely on disability services. Given this, what are the elements of a genuinely helpful partnership between a person and a service?

A story to start with

My brother received a support package, moved out of a group home and into his own home in 1996. At that time we partnered with a local service with experience in devolution and supporting people in their own homes^[1].  In 2005 however, we found ourselves in a collapsed relationship with this service. Ultimately it became nasty. It rendered my brother effectively homeless for about a year. It was long and arduous, but ultimately we decided to seek a new provider and a new relationship (NB this demonstrates the importance of portability of funding).

And so this was the context in which we were about to meet the key ‘implementation person’ of another service. We already had a positive response from the CEO and now the next step was to meet the person who could help make it happen.

The meeting was arranged at my brother’s home. Big tick already. I remember we had a meal together. Another big tick. She got up and did the washing up! Yes, we stood and had a conversation about our experience, my brother’s needs, getting to know us as the washing up happened, and it was no artfulness on her part!

A sound basis for good partnership

There are many subsequent stories to tell about this woman, but all of them have a common thread of ‘stick-with-it-ness’. She aligned herself wholly with the interests of my brother and of doing her all to make things work for him. Consequently she stuck with the ups and downs of his life and getting his supports the best they could be. She still remains very connected to my brother eight years later, in friendship and guidance.

“Lucky you” you might say. The point of this story is NOT ‘if or when you find a good person, then you should go with that service’. Of course that is too random, and good people come and go too, so no, this is not a sound basis for partnership.

Rather, through this story and this relationship we can extract many things that ARE the basis of good partnership:

• ‘submissive posture’ – the onus is on me to build trust, openness, questioning, curiosity
• recognition of where people have come from and therefore what mindset they may have
• equality of relationship
• commitment to the person
• ability to effectively and repeatedly problem-solve

I summarise our relationship as: The road ahead is unknown. Quite probably lots of mistakes will be made. We can’t say what it will look like from our end. We want to say that we’ll make a commitment to you to work it out as we go.

An A-side and a B-side make a record!

Yes back in the dreaded past, there were magical things called records (check it out on Wikipedia if you don’t believe me)! A record has an A-side and a B-side. You flipped a record over, played the other side and together they made beautiful music!

Michael Kendrick explains partnership through an A and B dialogue. It was revelatory when I first heard it and made me immediately think of this record analogy. An A side and a B side are two sides of the one thing.

Actually going to Wikipedia isn’t a bad idea, because you get to read things like this, “The A-side usually featured the recording that the artist, record producer, or the record company intended to receive the initial promotional effort and then receive radio airplay, hopefully, to become a hit record. The B-side (or “flip-side”) is a secondary recording that has a history of its own.”

So you see, they are two sides of the one thing, but they both have different roles. This is the beauty of a genuine partnership. It is an alliance that benefits both because each is providing something the other doesn’t have or doesn’t want to have. In the business world, for example, good partnerships help each party go further. “I’ve got a great product. You’ve got access to a large market. Let’s make business love!” In fact there is a whole area of business theory that says partnerships are the real key to success.

Of course in our context we are talking about an historical power imbalance between the parties. We also need to take into account that relationship is not purely transactional (although I would argue that even in the business world relationships are not just transactional). Despite this, however, I think this framework gives us a very good starting point.

Adopting a mindset of “our presence will benefit this organisation”, not just this organisation will benefit us and thinking through those benefits changes the conversation. In other words don’t go in as the “underdog”. I remember even in 2005, we treated this as partnership building. When seeking a service we discussed and proposed my brother’s needs and our values, in order to find a good match. It has worked well for us and is an approach I have supported other families to use, with good results. It often results in very exciting, very relevant, living service agreements (happy to share some examples if you contact me).

This kind of approach isn’t only successful if you have a funding package. I know people who were only eligible for support that came through block funding, but managed to negotiate the personalisation of those resources through this kind of approach. For many years my brother accessed a day service that was block funded. He is too old to have been eligible for the individualised day program funding now available in NSW. My mother, ever sharp as a tack, realised the moment when his day service was to be moved to a non-government provider it could be seen as an opportunity. So we used this approach to negotiate a more individualised approach. This was the catalyst for him to leave the day program and do more interesting things with his life, like start a small business!

I’m a big believer in vision, mindset and thinking outside the box FIRST. Make the money follow and support that rather than starting with the money!

A-side

As families, we often think only about ‘what the service should be doing’. But what are our roles and responsibilities in creating an ethical partnership?

As I have eluded to, we have found it very helpful to approach service providers in the same way we interview/recruit for support workers – looking for a good match.

Take some time to develop what you need.  I know this can be difficult but it is worth the investment.  Think of it like a proposal – “hey, we are looking to do X, Y and Z. We could really use some help with A ,B, C to make that happen. What do you say to that”?  Think about what you don’t think already exists in you, your family, networks, community, and use these gaps to identify possible provider roles.

The conversations never quite go as linear as the above but it avoids the approach of ‘let’s hear what they can do and choose the least worst option’. You want to hear what a service can do, but in relation to what you need. Otherwise what you tend to get is a service menu. And often you can negotiate something new that the service didn’t have on its menu because you have articulated excitement, innovation and benefit.

Triple win thinking is so powerful here. A powerful proposition articulates:

What is the benefit to the person?

What is the benefit to the family?

What is the benefit to the service?

What’s in it for all these parties? When you are talking from this perspective you are inviting someone to join your big vision.

As families we have a responsibility too to build the relationship. If we want control and decision-making in particular areas, we must commit to the responsibilities this entails. This might mean we need to learn some things and spend time understanding them more. This doesn’t mean we have to do this alone – indeed perhaps this is what you need assistance from a provider to do. For example, I’ve been in some great meetings between providers and families who want control over recruitment, induction and supervision of support workers. Meetings where information was shared to create reasonable OHS checks, simple reporting procedures and understanding responsibilities under the relevant employment award.  If we want this control then it is also our responsibility to employ people legally and pay them fairly. We need to thank, and acknowledge where things have been very helpful. It’s a truism – but in the lead-up to the NDIS, there is no better time to be letting a provider know about the things that really work and are really helpful! After all, this is what we want more of.

B-side

There is much to be said about what would be helpful from the service provider side, given the historical power imbalances in this area^[2].

I want to focus on 3 things that can really assist families as part of an ethical partnership. They all focus on helping families address adaptive barriers to change. This is a capacity-building agenda. If we have a situation where services are simply saying “we’ll just do what the family wants because that’s empowerment”, this is not always helpful in terms of the goal of developing life-giving opportunities for the person with disability. And after all, this should be the driving ethic of both service provision AND family-governance.

Firstly, families themselves are not immune to being blocked by the same things that block society in general; for example, low expectations, not having a sense of what is possible beyond current experience, having past negative experiences that make them risk averse, and trying to work things so that they can get on with their own lives (which might mean the person with disability is not always placed first). This means that families too might only be making choices within the perspective or experience they know.

‘Choice’ is a word bandied about a lot. It is very helpful to find ways of working with people that develop trust. When trust is present, it is possible to ask questions and have conversations in which people can start to see choices that they didn’t think were once possible. Services can assist families by exposing them to peer leaders who are doing things they might not have imagined possible.

Secondly, when we are seeking to be the author of our own life, many things have the potential to derail us.  For many people for example, the fear of being rejected when you take a step forward in your community can be a huge thing, but making lasting change depends upon stepping forward.

Thirdly, if given time and a structure to ‘imagine better’, rather than simply focusing on what is not working, I find families have no shortage of fabulous ideas and often the energy and tenacity to try, fail and try again. Even very tired people!

People become hungry for ideas and strategy on how to make their vision happen. Services could provide this structure.

These could be fabulous assistive possibilities on the B-side, where a service takes an ethical stance ‘alongside’ (not ‘doing for’) people in their own efforts at change.

As we can see this doesn’t just involve saying “we’ll do whatever you want because it’s your choice”! An ethical partnership can involve gristle, challenge and breaking new ground.

For a range of awesome perspectives on this topic, click here for journal by Belonging Matters 

For a shorter version of this piece on the Every Australian Counts website click here

The right people are more likely to step forward when you are really clear on the purpose of paid support. Additionally, people are more likely to stick around when they are fully informed of the expectations and when they understand and share your vision. Unspoken or hidden expectations tend to lead to disappointment and to unnecessary turnover.

Start at the end

Asking the question, ‘What is the end result I am looking for?’ is a really great way to start thinking about purpose.

The importance of such a question can be revealed in exploring this scenario. Consider someone who likes gardening. You might consider matching paid support to this interest and conclude that finding a gardener is the way to go. Taking some time to consider purpose, however, can reveal some interesting differences. If the purpose of the role is to build a garden, finding a gardener might work. But if purpose is to increase opportunities for connection to others through this interest, a person only skilled in gardening may not cut it (excuse the pun).

Here are some other ideas to assist your thinking.

Think about how others get the task done

Ask: how do other people get this thing done or achieve this?
Firstly, think about the task that needs to be done. Now think about how that same or similar issue is solved by other people. How do others in our community get this kind of thing done?

This gives us some great clues on what we want to model and replicate. Sometimes we tend to jump to service and paid responses first. But asking this question allows us to take a breather and see if there are other solutions we could put our energy into (the time and energy we would be using to find paid assistance or service solutions).

So give these scenarios some consideration in light of this:

1. You’ve lost track of time and now your garden is in need of a makeover.
2. You need your lawn mowed regularly

• you have never tried mowing a lawn before and aren’t sure if you could do it.
• you could learn but you aren’t interested and prefer to dedicate time elsewhere
• you aren’t able to mow your lawn

What are different solutions to these scenarios?

Generally the more formal, regular and structured the task is, the more likely it is in our society, to seek a paid solution. But a lot also depends on our family culture, background, gender, the place you live, income, age…… So think about what makes sense to you.

I know in my life, I would be more inclined to turn my dishevelled garden into a social opportunity, provide food and drink or even offer to assist friends with something in exchange for their help. Our lawn is large. I can learn to mow but I’m not interested in mowing. However, this is not something I think is reasonable to ask a friend or neighbour to do on a regular basis. Sure – collect my mail, feed my cat for a couple of days. But not mow the lawn regularly. A neighbour might offer because we have built a reciprocal relationship, but this is different to me asking. Additionally our living expenses mean that getting someone else to do this regularly is not possible. So I need to mow my lawn. But you might have a different response that fits your culture, family, income, community etc! It’s the process of thinking through that is important.

This kind of thinking helps us understand the place of paid support, whether it is actually needed, and also helps us think about the place of informal relationships and whether we could focus energy on this rather than on paid support.

So ask yourself: what can a paid person bring that natural support might not bring? How can paid support add value to what I already have? (not take away or cut off an opportunity for growth of other kinds of relationships)

Regularity, structure and formal teaching are some examples of answers to these questions.

Some other examples are:

• Social connection/bridge building into different parts of a community
• Building a fuller picture of who the person is: helping the person learn more about themselves, trying different activities, exploration and trial. This can be important for people whose interests are unknown or unexplored
• Learning new skills
• Personal care
• Role modelling and mentoring – behaviours, feelings, thinking
• Generating new ideas – creative, innovative, considered ideas
• Team development – developing the cohesion and functionality of a team
• Work or business development

Clarity on role and purpose really helps us to hone the characteristics we are looking for in people. What qualities, skills and interests are we looking for in people? Let’s look at that next.

We’d love to hear your thoughts on successful techniques.

If you want to learn more,  join us for our upcoming webinar on December 9 2014!

Click here to hear what a participant has said about our sessions.

Register here for our webinar on the 5th November 2014

Register here  for our information sessions in Newcastle, NSW, on the 13th and 19th November 2014

In this video, Linda Hughes talks about self-directing supports for her son

In the video below, Catherine Mahony shares why she chose to direct her supports under the NDIS

Photo of Carolyn Campbell McLean

Carolyn Campbell-McLean is  Senior Facilitator with My Choice Matters, NSW. For 13 years she has used the Attendant Care Program and has self-managed her support for 6 years. This involves managing a team of 7 people who provide her and her partner with daily support. Carolyn believes she has really honed her skills in choosing appropriate people.

Don’t miss her 8 Hot Tips on creating and keeping your dream team!

Download Word version of There is no ‘I’ in team

Download the PDF version of There is no ‘I’ in team

Brightly coloured flowers

Lucy and her family have been very thoughtful in creating a role at her local florist. In this article we share the very practical steps they took.

Download the word version of Engineering the ordinary

Download the PDF version of Engineering the ordinary

Self Direction opens up an exciting array of possibilities and more than ever the opportunity to be the author of your own destiny.

But sometimes it can be hard to fathom just what is possible beyond our current experience. Being in charge is more than about having control over services, funding and supports. It’s about harnessing that control to break with the past, to get innovative, and to embark on new ways of doing things.

Download the word version of Getting creative with paid support

Download the PDF version of Getting Creative with paid support

“If I look at you like an impoverished person and you see yourself as a victim, no amount of money will change this.”

Below is an excerpt of a speech I delivered for The School for Social Entrepreneurs titled “Social Enterprise and its potential for creating more inclusive and sustainable communities” – February 20th, 2014.

“I’m very excited this evening to tell you a bit about the enterprise I founded, InCharge, and also to share my thoughts on the connections between social enterprise, genuine innovation and the creation of an inclusive society.

When I was 7 years old, my older brother, Matthew, left our family home, to be cared for elsewhere. Far from aiding our family as it was promised to be, it skewed it, and sent my brother on the path of a different and separate life to us. He spent his childhood languishing and abused in a large hostel and then in group homes. I remember arriving at his 18th birthday celebration to find that the only people there were his immediate family, and the paid staff of his group home. I remember my father cried. It was a wake-up call for me.

Imagine if your only relationships were with people paid to be there? This is the life experience of a client, not a contributor. So something had to change.

Matthew has now lived in his own home for 16 years and shared it consistently with people without disability. He has his own small business built on his interests and capacities. He has frequent gatherings of friends, supporters and family.

The difference is extraordinary. Yet Matthew is only one of 400,000 people with significant disabilities in Australia. So actually and unfortunately his deprivation is not unusual.

InCharge was created to change the experiences of others who struggle to experience a life of contribution and rich relationships. Our vision is a society where everyone’s potential is realised and where we thrive among people who love and care about us.

We exist to assist people with disability be the authors of their own lives. When people are truly in charge they are ignited by possibility in their own lives, and they also have the resources, tools and mindset to go get it. This is a self-directed life. Through our products, services and partnerships we seek to ignite possibility and then assist people put the pieces in place that turn possibility into reality.

Why is this important?

Let’s go back to that moment when my parents stepped forward and asked for assistance. What did they encounter? Well they encountered a human service system. It is now an industry, and it is essentially predicated on the belief that ‘special’ people need specialist solutions delivered by experts in specially built places. Separate schools, classrooms, homes, workplaces and centres to train people and provide therapy and other interventions. Mostly we encounter people as they drive past us in white buses or as they move in groups through our shopping centres. We see them in the distance of our lives. In our desire to assist people get a better deal we have actually created the tools of exclusion.

Such a system cannot deliver the stuff of a good life. It cannot deliver love, it cannot deliver intimacy, it cannot deliver belonging or purpose, friendship, or being an actor in one’s own life.

Ultimately this is what we want for ourselves; a life of contribution, a life of richness.

If we are to bring such an inclusive community to life then we need to look now in different places for solutions. This is all of our business – to look for the real leaders and the genuine solutions.

We are fortunate in Australia that there are now many more opportunities for people to step beyond a life lived in ‘service land’. There are so many more people now who have ideas about their good life, who are trying things and who have different expectations. Who are basically sticking their fingers up at the persistent and draining low expectations that pervades our society.

So we believe that one of the most powerful things that can happen is to shine a light, support and nurture ideas people are generating themselves. These are the places it make sense to look for the kinds of solutions that really create an inclusive society. And this is also where support to social enterprise could be of such benefit.

As the founder of InCharge I have chosen a social enterprise framework because it has allowed the freedom to find the best ways to shine a light and support genuine innovation. It has been so beneficial to explore the kind of petri dish that bubbles and ignites this stuff. Remaining loose but focussed, allows us to explore the spaces between, where exciting things might burst forth. I believe the 4 way partnership that has supported Nathan – who will speak to you in a moment – to become an SSE student is a fine example of this. Social enterprise has really helped us to think about our sustainability. The idea that we can create our own resources and scale when we need to. Focussing on the internal assets and capacities of the organisation as a starting place to generate value, including financial value, has been revolutionary to me coming from a traditional non-profit background.

So you are going to hear from Nathan Basha tonight.

But what other interesting innovations are we finding?

People with significant disabilities are finding ways for themselves to work. Micro-enterprise and small niche businesses are becoming a very attractive idea for many people assessed out of employment support, and otherwise find themselves relegated to a drab life of endless activities, community access and training.

People are finding very interesting ways of being supported to move into their own homes, thus breaking the nexus of the non-choice between being their parents home forever or living with other people with disabilities. They are living with people without disabilities, they are creating intentional communities of disabled and non disabled people.

People with intellectual disability and their advocates are creating pathways into university

1. see University of Sydney
2. and the formative program in Alberta, Canada

They are building their own enterprises built to address very specific barriers – please look on our links page for some fabulous examples.

So what are the threads that bind these kinds of ideas, projects and movements?

I want share with you what I think are some of the hallmarks of genuine innovation. Again I hope you see the universality in these for all of us working to create more inclusive societies.

Sustainability

Long lasting, personal relationships are the key to ongoing quality of life. Innovative enterprises create a more inclusive society by assisting people to tap into the wealth of ideas, people, energy and financial resources within their own networks, or to build these where they don’t exist.

 Active citizenry

People are not just receivers. Innovative enterprises showcase and build on people’s innate capacities and interests, in order to realise potential.

Addressing adaptive barriers to change

When we are seeking to be the author of our own life, many things have the potential to de-rail us. What are the barriers to change that confront those in the communities you work in?

For people with disability for example, the fear of being rejected when you take a step forward in your community can be a huge thing, but making lasting change depends upon stepping forward.? Innovative enterprises aspire to be with and for people in their own efforts at change.

Developing rich relationships

Unsatisfied with the dominance of paid relationships, innovative enterprises break this dominance and offer people a vision of a life lived with many different kinds of people and relationships.

Welcoming environments

Innovative enterprises work with the richness that already exists in our community to assist it become more adept? at inclusion. We don’t need to keep building separate.

Autonomy and control

Innovative enterprises focus on the conditions in which autonomy and greater control by people themselves can thrive.

I think we need to invest in the leaders, projects or enterprises which are attempting to show value in very non traditional areas and seeking the kinds of impacts that go to the heart of an inclusive society then we are on to something very exciting indeed.

Thank you for your time.”