Well we got some great responses and comments and asked one commentator if she would like to write a Guest Blog to keep the conversation going. Thank you Ellen Fraser-Barbour*! We think you have raised some excellent points to consider around the recruitment of support workers.

We have reached out, and are hoping that our next piece is a response from some organisations discussed in our original piece. That way we can get a really good conversation going.

Over to you, Ellen.

Photo of Ellen Fraser-Barbour

The NDIS market has seen a rise in the range of services offered, from large traditional provider models to smaller in-community neighbourhood team and online connector models. In my experience the NDIS is opening doors to new exciting opportunities and this should be encouraged.  In my experience online models offer simplicity, flexibility, ease of booking, convenience and affordability. In-community support workers working within an agency or team, can offer a degree of support and “back-up” when planning and managing all the ins and outs of what this important work entails.

I have been wondering, however, about how these new types of self management models safeguard. Yes they, alongside all service providers, have policies in place to ensure safety, security and support for individuals, families and workers and these policies are vitally important but I can think of many examples where traditional large agencies are up to the hilt in policy but do necessarily invest in developing an active organisational culture or practice that truly embraces a human rights approach at base level. Policies are there, but putting this into practice seems to be easier said, than done. This has been highlighted in recent inquiries into abuse in disability services.

If questions of accountability and complaints processes were difficult to ask within large traditional service systems prior to the NDIS, it is now an urgent consideration with the NDIS. Bureaucracy is still there and it is still exhausting and ‘messy’ and complex for people with disabilities and their families to navigate. The only difference is that ideally, people with a disability now decide who is worth the stress and who isn’t.

In my experience, the issues of safeguarding are not black and white, like they might seem in policies. I can think of many examples of risky scenarios and ethical dilemmas people find themselves in every day. Life is complicated and there may be times when individuals or families are under immense stress. These stresses vary over time and place. Some situations of crisis are very apparent but others seem more hidden and are not identified until things have already escalated and workers might need to be able to respond in a moment to these situations. Adversity and crisis can take over and informal support networks may disintegrate. In these circumstances, support workers and professionals may be the primary point of contact for support and a vital link. In reality, however, workers may only be employed for short times, may not be not highly skilled and are working for a basic wage with a high turn over rate. There may be times when there’s a crisis beyond the scope of what that worker can deal with. I think there are times when the worker may well decide it’s “too hard” and leave, or alternatively, individuals may question the actions of workers and may well decide to sack. One hears about families who have been through a whole range of workers lasting a very short time. I think this usually suggests that the support networks fail both workers and individuals.

I think this is where Support-Coordinators or case-managers can be useful. If they’re good at their job, they would be “checking in” to see how things are going with individuals and with their support ‘team’. There may also be times when conflicts happen (because we’re human) and NDIS goals slip to the bottom of our priority list. Issues need to be addressed rapidly, calmly and sensitively and this is aided when there is an identified person available and accessible within that person’s network. Support Coordinators can debrief with families and assist with transitioning to new supports or linking to other disability or mainstream services.

At base level, questions need to be asked about safeguards when self-managing support workers. I admit to feeling out of my depth in even trying to pinpoint some specific questions and I worry I’m opening a can of worms, but I will put myself out on a limb here in the hope that some conversation is generated.

Here are a handful of questions I think organisations or self-managing employers could consider.

How do we show commitment to building trust between people with a disability, families, workers and organisations?

Without trust, it is very difficult for anyone to feel safe disclosing concerns. We are human and what is conflicting for one person, may not be for others. I think this is particularly relevant if connecting workers & individuals online without face to face meetings or a “middle man”. Expectations of stakeholders aren’t always made clear.

What avenues are there for disclosing issues safely and confidentially if things go wrong between individuals and their workers?

If support workers are not part of an organisation who do individuals and/or workers negotiate and receive support from, in times of conflict and stress? Being the direct employer is appealing when things are going well. With participants “driving the bus” so to speak, it means issues should be discussed with them first (as it should be). But what happens when there is a crisis and the person with the disability and/or their workers need more support and resources?

In my experience and from what I have heard of others, even in large organisations with strict hierarchical structures, support for individuals and workers is often lacking in times of crisis. With more workers without any back up or organisation, how are stakeholders protected when approaching sensitive concerns and possible conflicts?

Who is responsible for offering professional development to individuals, their families or their workers as we navigate this new NDIS world?

How is training is offered and how frequent is this training? In particular how do self-managed employers and independent employees access professional development to keep abreast development in the field and up to date best practice? How do we standardise training across sectors in light of the NDIS?  In circumstances where agencies are involved, how much time do service providers really have and how often do they touch base with both individuals and workers and offer professional development, training, debriefing or support?

Of course, these are just a handful of questions one could ask – the issues are complex and I don’t think there are silver bullet solutions or quick answers in terms of how we navigate safeguards and dignity of risk. I am, however, an optimist and a believer in generating conversations about where the gaps are.  These conversations need to represent diversity in order to be truly productive. I hope that there are opportunities for the voices of many to be heard.

I also hope that in writing this piece, I might encourage people to share personal experiences and ideas about how we engage, build bridges and offer the best quality supports and continue to work towards progress.

*Disclaimer:   The author wishes to make it clear that this writing does NOT represent the views of organisations she works for – past or present and is merely her own perspective.

NOTE; The majority of concerns are not necessarily about abuse, or violence and are not severe in nature- but there are times when they are and in these circumstances professionals at all levels of services are mandated to formally report any incidences or suspicions of abuse, violence or neglect to their respective statutory bodies such as the Child Abuse Report line (in SA).

Ellen Fraser-Barbour

This is the second post of our six-part series on confusion-clearing and myth-busting pieces about the NDIS. As we said in the first post, What’s going on with the float for people who self-manage their NDIS funds, please respond in the comments or contact us if you’ve been given different advice from the National Disability Insurance Agency (NDIA)!

This is another confusion-clearing piece – this time about the difference between Support Coordination, Plan Management and Local Area Coordinators (LACs).

Support Coordination

As an NDIS participant, you (or your nominee) become responsible for getting started, understanding your plan and its budgets, and finding and connecting with supports and services in your community to achieve your the goals in your plan.

A Support Coordinator is someone who could be funded separately in your NDIS plan to help you do just this!

They are like the person you can look at and say ‘Holy cow now I have my plan what do I do now?’

They should be like a partner to you to ‘breathe life into your plan’ and become your contact person.

At present they must also be a person or provider who is registered by the NDIA to provide this service.

The official definition of Support Coordination by the NDIA is

‘Assistance to strengthen participants abilities to coordinate and implement supports and participate more fully in the community. It can include initial assistance with linking participants with the right providers to meet their needs, assistance to source providers, coordinating a range of supports both funded and mainstream and building on informal supports, resolving points of crisis, parenting training and developing participant resilience in their own network and community.’

You can find more information about Support Coordination in our Mixed Messages: My First Plan (and How Do I Help People to make the most of their Planning Meetings blog on LinkedIn. If you think you need Support Coordination, you will need to discuss needing assistance for implementing your plan in your planning meeting .

For more information about the services we provide, click here.

Plan Manager

Plan Management is one of the ways you can manage your NDIS funding package. Remember there are three options:

• Manage your own funds (self-management)
• Get a professional to do it (plan-management)
• Let the NDIA do it (agency-management)
• A combination of the above.

Again, you will need to say in your planning meeting how you want to manage your NDIS funding package – and you can choose a mix of these options in a way that best suits you.

So a Plan Manager can help with the financial tasks of a plan. For example, organising providers and their payments, processing of claims and invoices and tracking of budgets. They may also do some tasks like a Support Coordinator does – for example, liaising with providers and perhaps trouble-shooting. They are also paid separately in your NDIS plan to do this. They must also be a registered provider.

Like self-management, if you plan-manage your funds, you can use any provider you think will help you achieve the goals in your plan. They don’t need to be registered. We have assisted people link with local services that are not NDIS registered to help achieve their goals – local small business advisors, personal concierges and cleaners as some examples.

So choosing a Plan Manager can be a great way of getting the benefits of self management, but with someone to assist with the financial side of things.

Remember that our social media assistant, Lauren, uses a Plan Manager, and writes about it here.

Local Area Coordinators (LAC)

An LAC may be the person you meet with during your first planning meeting, and then perhaps afterwards.

Because of the large number of people coming through the NDIS, LACs have been tasked with gathering data and information from people in their planning meetings, and will pass this information onto the NDIA so they can turn it into a plan. That is, they have taken on a planning role, although only the NDIA has authority to create an actual plan with dollars against it.

The NDIA has also said that a number of people will be allocated an LAC to help them implement their plan, and perhaps this will be for people they think only need a small amount of help to get started – not for those who need Support Coordination.

We wrote about the specifics of the NSW planning process here.

LACs do not work for the NDIA. In NSW, St Vincent de Paul and Uniting are the organisations that received funding to do this. There are also LACs in some parts of Victoria. Tenders for other States are happening now.

There is some controversy surrounding LACs taking on these planning specific roles. This is because this was not the original intention of the role. Indeed, LAC has a long history in Western Australia, particularly, of vital community development and capacity building work. This is because it is understood that genuine inclusion takes more work than just people with disabilities using their individualised funding packages. For a recent critique about this read here.

Summary

Support Coordination is when someone helps you to implement your plan, get started and find services and supports in your local community. Plan Management is one of three funding options you can use to manage your NDIS funds, and Local Area Coordinators (LACs) have been tasked with gathering data and information from people in their planning meetings, and will pass this information onto the NDIA so they can turn it into a plan.

This is the first post in a six-part series of confusion-clearing and myth-busting pieces about the NDIS! We hope it is helpful. As always, your feedback is welcome – particularly feedback where information you’ve received differs from what we’ve written here.

This piece is a confusion-clearing piece regarding the float for people who self-manage their NDIS funds.

Belinda Rogers, member of the Greens party and transitioning to the NDIS herself, recently spoke with InCharge intern Katy Gagliardi to clarify the confusion around the float for people managing their NDIS funds.

Prior to the July 1, 2016 rollout of the National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS), a float was made available to people in the trial regions who chose to self-manage their funds.

The float was one month’s advance payment so that people self-managing their funds could pay for various services and items in a timely manner. At the end of the month, payments made from the funds were reimbursed so that someone who is self-managing would never be out of pocket for expenses incurred, and that various providers would be guaranteed timely payments.

The confusion around whether the National Disability Insurance Agency (NDIA) would continue to provide a float for people self-managing their funds has continued. This is because the information provided in Module 2 by the NDIA currently states that the float will continue, whereas this advice differs from what people have been advised verbally by the NDIA.

Belinda spoke with Ian Maynard, Deputy CEO of the NDIA, who confirmed via email that the information stated in Module 2 is now out of date and incorrect – and that a float will not be made available for people who are self-managing their funds.

Instead, the following two options are available:

• The NDIA will reimburse participants via the portal, or
• Participants will need to have an account with service providers.

This change, as you may already know, raises a number of issues that potentially make self-management financially untenable for many people.

Although the NDIA have attempted to mitigate these issues by allowing for people to apply for an advance emergency payment where needed, this flies in the face of the ideological premise of the NDIS: Choice and Control. Instead of being able to pay providers on time without hassle, people with disability are once again in a position of ‘welfare recipient’ – reliant upon an external body to judge whether they are the ‘deserving’ or ‘undeserving’ poor. Given that justification for needing these funds upfront has already been provided, this money should be readily available. Instead, the decision to remove the float subjects people to continued lack of dignity around funds that have been taken away without consultation with primary stakeholders from the outset.

In any case, if enough people self-manage their funds and apply for emergency payments, this would create a backlog that would create further work for the NDIA – thus making the original plan of having a float more viable for everyone concerned.

If the NDIA reimburses participants via the portal, that means that participants will need to initially pay service providers and other relevant expenses out of pocket. This arrangement relies on a person, who is possibly on partial or full Disability Support Pension (DSP), having the funds upfront to pay for the very services, etc, that the NDIS was designed to pay for.

Alternatively, service providers will be out of pocket until the participant receives the funds via the portal, which has been problematic in and of itself since the rollout of the NDIS. In addition, given that the ideological premise of the NDIS is that people with disability will have more choice and control – if a person chooses to purchase continence aids from Aldi, it is not likely that Aldi will set up an account for a person self-managing their funds through the NDIS. What is more likely is that people who self-manage their funds will be forced through circumstance to continue to use disability-specific providers for items that they could otherwise get from Aldi and other mainstream stores.

In addition, small businesses and individuals – including self-employed support workers – may not be able to afford to have people running accounts with them, which makes it harder for these providers to work with people who self-manage their funds due to this legislative change.

This all provides a major disincentive to people to self-manage their NDIS funds. As a result, the premise of ‘choice and control’ for people with disability is eroded, and the existing paradigm of ‘choice and control’ for the funding body is once again reinforced instead.

People who are currently self-managing their funds and have experienced the benefits of this are working to have this decision reversed.

Self-management, when effectively communicated and implemented, provides huge benefits for everyone: it is a true opportunity for choice and control to occur more and more in practice, and it would be a real shame if legislative requirements continued to make self-management more difficult than it needs to be.

A ‘call to action’ for people interested in working to overturn this decision is planned for the near future. Watch this space!

EDIT: In the meantime, if you would like to express your displeasure with this decision, the best people to contact are (either/and):

• Your local Federal MP. You can search for yours here
• The NDIA feedback line: feedback@ndis.gov.au or call on 1800 800 110
• Greens Senator Rachel Siewart: (02) 6277 3587 or senator.siewert@aph.gov.au

UPDATE FROM BELINDA AT 24 AUGUST:

“The Deputy CEO of the NDIA, Ian Maynard, rang me this morning after receiving my email yesterday. He is taking this very seriously and recognises the barriers this policy places in the way of people who want to self manage. He has set up a meeting with the Finance Controller of the NDIS in early October to review and change the policy. At this stage he is talking about altering it to ensure that anyone who has costs in their plan that could result in an out of pocket expense will be able to set their plan up to have that money available as a float. It won’t be done under a ‘hardship’ provision and although it is a somewhat cumbersome way of going about it and he acknowledges it is less than perfect, it is certainly better than being out of pocket or having to ask service providers to run an account for us.

I discussed the Victorian ISP model with him and he will also be looking into that as a possible example of how self management may be done. (Slightly mind boggling that the NDIS hadn’t actually explored all previous systems before going ahead….. )

He will be confirming our conversation by email and will be keeping me in the loop regarding the meeting in October and consulting with me regarding possible changes as they arise”

UPDATE FROM BELINDA AT 14 SEPTEMBER:

“(I have received) confirmation of the meeting with the Independent Advisory Council meeting in November to look again at the policy and confirmation that participants can ask for a forward payment of an agreed amount of an upcoming cost (physio account, etc) with one weeks’ notice to avoid being out of pocket. But no actual reinstatement of the float.”

UPDATE FROM BELINDA AT 20 OCTOBER:

“As many of you are aware during the trial period people who self managed received an advance float of one month’s funding which was topped up monthly. As of July 1 this was scrapped and people either had to pay up front themselves and be reimbursed or apply a week in advance for each line item and then wait for the money to be deposited up to a week later to cover costs. This would be incredibly time consuming, difficult, prone to error and creates ridiculous obstacles when the NDIS is supposed to be about flexibility, choice and control.

I have been in many conversations with Deputy CEO of the NDIA, Ian Maynard, regarding this and have been talking to various politicians too.

Tomorrow Senator Rachel Siewert from the Greens is taking it to Senate committee hearing and pushing to have the policy overturned. I have filled her in on the impact this has been having on so many of us (whilst respecting everyone’s privacy) and will let you know the outcome as soon as I hear.”

Image of a cherub statue playing a flute

We have been writing about the different ways you can manage your NDIS funding.

1. You can have the National Disability Insurance Agency (NDIA or Agency) do it

2. You can use a Registered Plan Manager

3. You can Self Manage

4. You can mix!

These are still choices, regardless of what happens in planning meetings, and this is why we are producing this information. It is always important to ask, and to know what is possible!

In this piece I begin an exploration of Self Management.

– Lauren Hislop

A personal quest: I admit to being hesitant about self management

Do you feel the same way? Well come explore with me …..

As a woman with a disability, I have felt disempowered by services in the past. For example, I require some personal assistance to prepare for the day. I have previously asked agencies if I could meet the carers before they come to assist me. This was never OK’d.  So, my experience has typically been that 10 minutes after I initially meet a carer, I have to strip naked in front of them.   I find this extremely dehumanising and disrespectful. It leaves me in an extremely vulnerable state.  Many people with disabilities have and still are experiencing this. We have been too afraid to voice our complaints as services could be reduced.

However, we are at a time when this situation could alter dramatically.

In a previous post I wrote how I moved from my NDIS plan being managed by the NDIA (Agency managed or the Agency) to choosing a Plan Manager to help me manage my funds. My life has improved considerably.

I would like to explore Self Management for the future. I know people who are self managing. Flexibility, choice and control seem to be some of the positives of self-managing your NDIS budget.

But I must admit to feeling very hesitant about it. My first thought was “I don’t think I have what it takes to self manage”.

Is this true?

I’ve decided to figure out the answers to some of my questions and hesitations.

This piece explores some of the real benefits people say they get through self managing.

It also looks at whether you can get help to do it.

Along with my research, I interviewed an NDIS participant, Naomi, and the parent of a NDIS participant, Linda, to gain some of their perspectives of self-managing.

She who pays the piper calls the tune

If you chose the Agency or a Plan manager to help manage your funds, you do have a say, and to different degrees (which is why I chose Plan Management).  However, you don’t have direct access to the funds allocated in your plan.

Direct access doesn’t mean you can just go spend money on whatever you want. You are still accountable. Like everyone, you have to spend the money to achieve what is says in your plan. You have to keep records and be accountable to the NDIA. You may be audited.

But what peaked my interest was something Linda said. She likens self-managing to the saying, ‘[s]he who pays the piper calls the tune’. This means the person managing the money gets to determine how it’s spent. With self-management, providers are completely directly accountable to you.

Naomi claims that, “For me personally, self-managing allows me to control the various supports I need.’

Naomi and Linda believe they have more flexibility over their supports than they would if they had the NDIA manage their budget.

Naomi claimed that, “It allows me more flexibility in choosing what supports are important and more choice of who will provide them and how they will be provided’’.

Everyone stated it gives them a clearer understanding of the amount of money they have.

More choice in support

I was curious about what this meant. I understood the NDIS meant that I could choose any provider I wanted, regardless of how my funds are managed.

With self-management you can get support from a provider of your choosing, whether or not they are registered with the NDIA . If your funds are managed by the NDIA, you can only use registered providers.

In my previous piece on Plan Management I explained how I used a small business person to offer me training and mentoring to find work. She is not registered as an NDIS provider, but is someone who has helped me achieve my NDIS goal in Finding Work.

Linda’s son wants to live independently with flatmates his own age. She wants to take a supported living approach that is tailored to her sons needs. She claims she doesn’t want him in a group home where he wouldn’t have any control over his life. Traditional service providers and/or the agencies may state that people with disabilities may have to accept living in group homes.  However,  with self-management Linda’s sons’ funding can be used in a creative way to engage a person with expertise in supported living to help Linda and her son go through the steps necessary to make this work.

You might know the therapist you want to use, for example, but they aren’t registered with the NDIA.

Both say you can get more for your money. Self managing means that you can search for the best price more easily, always bearing in mind quality.  Having said that, it also means that providers don’t need to stick to the price guide, so you need to think about what is valuable to you.

You are in control of how your plan is delivered.  If you self-manage you don’t have to have a registered provider offering you services. This includes mainstream providers. This aspect of self-management could be very freeing for participants.

Benefits in employing support workers

I am learning that there are a number of different ways you can engage support workers:

• Make a agreement with a service provider to use their workers or employ workers you find
• Engage an independent contractor
• Use an online employer of support workers
• Directly employ people yourself

There are new kinds of online services which help you engage contractors or employees.

When you are self managing, people said they can more easily do any of these options.

Self management especially makes it easier for people who want to employ their own workers.

Everyone stated that self-management has given them the opportunity to recruit and chose their own support workers. It has helped them move from feeling like a client (with associated feelings of burden and being powerless) to being an employer (empowered).

Naomi loves being in control of who she employs. Self-management has allowed Naomi to seek out and employ workers suited to her requirements. She stated that, with self-management, she has the flexibility to have workers whenever suits her (and within the limits of her funding).

There is a consistent theme about this with people stating variations of “ My staff are committed to my vision and goals and they understand what a good life is to me.  I no longer have to say to my friends that I can’t stay because I have to be put to bed at 8pm—I am now in charge of my life. It is really empowering to know that I am in full control of my life and I make the decisions.”

Do I have to do all this on my own?

Linda claims that, ironically,  ‘By taking on the responsibility and self-managing the funds I could have more flexibility and importantly delegate more tasks to others’.

Linda states that sometimes self-management is conveyed as a person having to do it all by themselves. However, a person can decide what they would like to take on and what they would like help with by someone else.

‘I am terrible with numbers. I can’t read a profit and loss sheet  and really all I want to know is if the budget is on track- if we are over spending or not.  So I have a bookkeeper to assist me to understand and keep track of the budget. He also assists me with the payroll for support workers’.

In fact,  Linda also engages a key worker to lead her team of workers. She pays that person a little bit more and they have been able to take over many admin duties such as rostering.

Linda asserted that people can attend their NDIS planning meeting and say they would like to self-manage but they need assistance, especially if they have never done it before.

There are others who could assist as well

• Support Coordinator – you may receive hours in your NDIS plan for help to implement it. This will be from someone called a Supports Co-ordinator.
• A Registered Plan Manager – they may have tools that can assist you. You find a plan manager through the Provider list on the NDIS website and increasingly through other online service provider registers.
• Recruitment agencies
• A worker dedicated to making social or community connections
• Local Area Coordinators
• Peer support
• Family, friends and others in your networks

You can request to self-manage all or some of the support budgets in your NDIS Plan. You may also choose to self-manage one part of your plan to get started and learn how to do it.

Get in touch with us if you want to explore how self management could work for you or people you support.

Here are some Plain and Easy English information about self management which links to good information about employing workers.

And here as well.

Here is another good website especially about employing support workers.

Stay tuned to learn more of the details of how this works in your NDIS plan. I know I’ve got more questions!

– Lauren Hislop

Image of bright yellow sunglasses and beads

Getting NDIS ready is also about deciding how you want to manage your NDIS funds.

There are three ways to manage your NDIS funding. The National Disability Insurance Agency (NDIA) can help you manage payments to your providers, you can manage these payments yourself (Self Management) or you can have another provider (a Plan Manager) assist you. You can even mix them!

In your planning meeting we want you to be informed about your options so you can state clearly what you would like to happen.

We’re going to be dedicating some air time in the next while to the two options called Plan Management and Self Management.

Please note that at the time of publication the NDIA launched a new website. On the old website there were two documents that clearly described Plan Management and we cannot locate them on the new website despite a lot of looking!

So….. Here is a link to information published by the A.C.T Government about these choices.

Here is another run-down about it.

These three options for managing your funds continue to exist!

Plan Managers need to be registered providers, so you can find and engage with them once you receive your plan, and through other organisations and businesses which are now listing providers.

Lauren Hislop lives in the Hunter NSW NDIS site and tells us about using a registered Plan Management provider.

Photo of Lauren Hislop

Goals are a bit daunting important

A few years ago I was initially a bit daunted about the prospect of setting goals for my first NDIS plan. I thought, “what if I’m currently satisfied with my life?”   However, as I did some self exploration, I discovered that there were, in fact, areas of my life that I wanted to improve.

I considered questions (and you can too) such as;

“what do I want my life to look like?”

“what excites me?” and

“what would infuse my life with colour?”

I had to be open to the possibilities.

My advice to people planning their goals is not to be afraid to dream big. When I first wrote my goals I was afraid to dream big. I wasn’t sure what goals to list, and maybe you aren’t sure too. However, with encouragement from others I dared to state my desires.

One of my goals was and is to find work.

Obtaining employment is one of my greatest desires. Being equipped with three university degrees I assumed I would get a position. However due to structural barriers I have found it a struggle. Unfortunately my disability overshadows my skills.

Turning goals into reality

Once I had established what my goals were, I had to figure out how to implement them. My goals were a template for my life.

When I received my first NDIS plan, it appeared great on paper. However I had no idea how to use it. I consider myself intelligent and yet I couldn’t figure out how to take advantage of it. At that time, NDIA were paying my support providers directly. Unfortunately I began to feel nothing had changed from before NDIS. I had the same agency providing me with the same care, but I was wanted something different.

Infusing my plan and life with colour

Last year I decided to engage a plan manager to help manage my funds. I also had some Supports Co-ordination hours in my plan to help with these kinds of things as well. I chose a local organisation that don’t provide any other kinds of services. I really like their independence and their values. These are two important things to look out for in my opinion.

From the moment I engaged a plan manager my life began to infuse with colour. I cannot believe how my life has changed. I have a plan manager, who puts me at the forefront of making my own decisions. They check to see how I’m going. They have done things like:

help me recruit my own workers

keep track of my budget

pay and process invoices

problem-solve with providers

This is definitely the best choice for me. I feel like I’m actually living life! It is so good to know that you are in control without having to deal with the mundane bits. It has made the principles, such as choice, a voice and control a reality in my life.

Gaining skills and finding work

Because I plan manage, I can use different kinds of services and supports to achieve the goals in my plan. I can definitely use disability services if I want, but I can also think beyond these. Previously I thought I had to use disability support workers for everything. This is one of the benefits of plan management and self management. I can look to different people, businesses and organisations in my community to help me achieve my goals.

In my plan I have some funding to help me develop confidence in my ability to undertake paid work. This is the importance of thinking about goals, because if I didn’t state this as a goal, it might not have led to this funding.

One brilliant outcome is I have used this funding to improve my professional skills.

I am a researcher and writer and have been looking for work in this area. I have been writing for  different disability rights organisations. There is a lot of great opportunity here with a growing number of organisations valuing and paying people with disability to write. This got us talking about the online world, content marketing and social media marketing opportunities. My plan manager informed me I could use my funding to engage someone in this area to mentor and train me.

I was put in touch with Andrea, a small business marketing consultant. Her training definitely equipped me better, so when Libby asked me to work for InCharge in this area, I was ecstatic.  This training will also help me with future opportunities. It enhances my appeal to other organisations who would like to contract me. I cannot express how much economic participation means to me and other people with disabilities. We yearn to be productive.

Freedom in finding my own support workers

One of the greatest benefits I have from plan management is that it has helped me to recruit my own support workers. Initially I just had personal care for an hour each day to help me shower and dress. I had no idea I could use workers for accessing the community  and other things.

There has been great freedom in interviewing and choosing for myself. My worker is invaluable. She does things like takes me shopping, attends appointments with me, helps with filing and making calls because my speech is slurred, and acts like a personal assistant in work meetings. Having this assistance has allowed me to feel that I am a valued member in the community. I set the hours she works. I’m in control.

In my opinion we need to make the most of our plan. This will not only impact on us as individuals but on society as a whole. If we have support we can use our talents and skills to enhance society. Enjoy the journey!

Marianne Williamson wrote

“It is our light, not our darkness
That most frightens us.”

It’s time to let our light shine